Anti-concurrent Causation Langue Enforceable

Cali v. Merrimack Mut. Fire Ins. Co. (NY App. 2d Dept. Aug. 14, 2007)

Court holds that anti-concurrent causation language in property policy precludes coverage for damage caused by excluded earth movement despite that collapse was caused in part by covered decay.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.insurancelawforum.com/admin/trackback/45365
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.