Excess Carriers Promising to Indemnify for Damages Not Obligated to Fund Voluntary Settlement

Aerojet-General Corp. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. (Cal. App., 3rd Dist., Sept. 13, 2007)

Court holds that excess carriers were not obligated to indemnify insured for sums insured agreed to pay as settlement of CERCLA claims, as sums were paid as part of settlement, and not court-adjudicated award of damages. Court relied on Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London v. Superior Court, 24 Cal.4th 945 (2001), reasoning that term “damages” means only money ordered by a court to be paid.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.insurancelawforum.com/admin/trackback/47396
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.