Van Conversion Not "Maintenance" Within Auto Exclusion

Posted on September 18, 2007 by Kevin Merriman

Guishard v. General Security Ins. Co. (NY Sept. 11, 2007)

Court holds that CGL policy’s auto exclusion bars coverage for injuries sustained while riveting metal on a van for the purpose of converting it to an ice cream truck. The activity was not "maintenance" within the meaning of a CGL policy's auto exclusion, as the work did not involve "an intrinsic part of the mechanism of the car and its overall function."

Tags: ,
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.insurancelawforum.com/admin/trackback/46528
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.