Insurer's Principal Place of Business Controls Choice of Law

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v Foster Wheeler Corp. (NY Oct. 11, 2007)

For reasons stated in the intermediate appellate court’s decision below (Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v Foster Wheeler Corp., 36 AD3d 17 (1st Dept. 2006)), New York’s high court affirms that, in determining the law governing liability policies covering multistate risks, the state of the insured's principal place of business is the primary factor and should be regarded as a proxy for the principal location of the insured risk, which is a controlling factor in determining the law applicable to a liability policy. Court reasoned that state of the insured's principal place of business has a greater concern with issues of policy construction and application bearing on the amount of coverage than do states where contracting, negotiation, or payment of the premium happened to occur.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.insurancelawforum.com/admin/trackback/49022
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.