Horsing Around With Coverage

There is a quaint notion in northern New England that insurance policies exist to pay claims.  This is abundantly true in the State of Maine, where courts have been remarkably liberal over the years in finding coverage for liability claims. 

In the most recent case of this sort, the First Circuit ruled last week in Centennial Ins. Co. v. Patterson, 08-1521 (1st Cir. April 23, 2009) that a professional liability insurer had a duty to defend a veterinarian for allegedly giving false testimony at a public hearing involving the plaintiff.

Continue Reading...

Are Insurers Liable For Chinese Import Dumping Duties?

All in all, it hasn't been a great year for Hartford.  First, it had to go down to Virginia to litigate with an insured about contaminated peanuts.  Then there were rumors about HFS selling off its P/C business.  Now John Heintz has sued Hartford and several other insurers for failing to pay up in a convoluted case involving cheap Chinese imported food products.

The Hartford Courant recently reported that a new class action has been filed by the Kelley Drye law firm in the U.S. Court of International Trade in which the mellifluously named "Honey Sioux" company and other U.S. food producers allege that Harfrod, Great American, XL and a division of Swiss Re aided and abetted the dumping of cheap Chinese food products in the United States by issuing customs surety bonds that guaranteed the payment of any dumping duties that the U.S. government later determined were owed. The suit also seeks recovery against the U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the U.S. Department of Commerce, which are accused of failing to collect hundreds of millions of dollars in anti-dumping duties that the plaintiffs now seek to recover under these policies. 

The plaintiffs are represented by John Heintz, Chairman of Kelley Drye’s insurance recovery and litigation practice group, former partner of Scott Gilbert and a veteran of the pollution coverage wars of the 1980s and 1990s.  In a Kelley Drye press release, Heintz explained that"Because these importers were new, thinly capitalized, and had little or no credit history or experience in importing, the insurers knew or should have known that the importers posed an extremely high risk of defaulting on assessed dumping duties. The insurers, nevertheless for years, continuously issued the bonds on behalf of the importers, and made millions of dollars in premiums."

Massachusetts Court Finds Coverage For Sick Building Claims

In a wide ranging opinion with significant negative implications for the ability of insurers to contest construction defect claims in Massachusetts, the First Circuit has ruled in Essex Ins. Co. v. BloomSouth Flooring Corp., No. 06-2750 (1st Cir. April 16, 2009), that a federal district court erred in granting summary judgment to a liability insurer for claims arising out of the discharge of fumes from defectively-installed carpet tile and related materials throughout the plaintiff’s building.
 

Continue Reading...

New Jersey Court Tackles Allocation Issues

Can it be that there are allocation issues that have yet to be addressed in New Jersey?  It seems so.

In Franklin Mut. Ins. Co. v. Metropolitan Property & Cas. Ins. Co., No. A-5265-07T2 (App. Div. April 17, 2009), the Appellate Division was asked to consider how the cost of cleaning up contamination from a leaking tank should be paid for where the pollution had begun a few prioir to the insured's purchase of the property in question.  In short, should each insurer’s share of the cost of clean up be measured by reference to its insured’s period of ownership or as a percentage of the overall period of time that pollution occurred?

Continue Reading...

Oregon Federal Court Addresses Who Is An Insured

In Mt. Hood, LLC v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16775 (March 3, 2009), the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon analyzed whether an individual and a corporation qualified as insureds under a policy issued to a condominium homeowners association. The HOA, Collins Lake Resort Homeowners Association, sued Mt. Hood, LLC and Kirk Hanna for damages based on breach of contract, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duties. The complaint alleged that Mt. Hood was the developer and that Hanna was both a board member of the HOA and a representative of Mt. Hood. The HOA alleged that Mt. Hood and Hanna were aware of construction defects at the resort and failed to inform the owners. The HOA also alleged that Hanna breached his fiduciary duty by assisting Mt. Hood in not paying its share of expenses and repair costs while Hanna was on the board of directors of the HOA. Mt. Hood and Hanna claimed that Travelers breached its insurance contract by denying the duty to defend.
 

Continue Reading...

Ninth Circuit Holds Anti-Assignment Clause Ambiguous

In Alexander Manufacturing, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust v. Illinois Union Ins. Co., 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 6396, the Ninth Circuit held that an anti-assignment clause prohibiting assignment of “interest under this Policy” was ambiguous. Plaintiff AMI, an employee stock ownership plan, sued three former AMI directors who were insured under a Directors & Officers policy issued by Illinois Union. Through settlement, AMI received an assignment of the directors’ rights under the Illinois Union policy. As assignee, AMI then filed suit against Illinois Union for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

Continue Reading...